Property advertisements are designed to attract buyers, and some present incomplete or exaggerated information. A buyer who relies on brochures, social media posts, or verbal promises without verification may face hidden costs, delayed possession, or missing facilities. Checking every claim against documents is the most reliable way to protect a real estate investment. This guide explains where claims commonly mislead and how to verify each one.
Unclear or Unverified Approvals
Phrases such as “approval in process” or “all approvals in place” mean little without proof. Ask for the SBCA approval letter, the sanctioned plan, and relevant NOCs, then match the project name, plot, and number of floors against them. If a developer cannot produce these documents, treat the claim as unconfirmed. Do not accept screenshots or verbal confirmation; request copies.
Hidden Charges in Payment Plans
An attractive booking amount can conceal additional costs. Ask for a written breakdown covering the total price, instalments, development charges, maintenance deposits, utility connection fees, and transfer costs. Compare the total payable amount, not just the monthly instalment. Check whether prices can change during the plan and what penalties apply for late payment. Confirm who issues receipts and in whose name, payments must be made.
Exaggerated Amenities and Renders
Computer-generated images show how a project may look, not what is guaranteed. Compare promised features such as a gym, play area, prayer area, generator backup, parking, and security with the specifications in the agreement. Amenities that appear only in advertisements cannot be relied upon. Visit an existing project by the same developer to judge actual quality.
Incomplete Project Information
Reliable projects share details openly: land ownership, unit sizes, floor plans, parking allocation, and handover terms. Be cautious when answers are vague, documents are withheld, or you are pressured by “limited units” and “last-day offers”. Buyers considering Samrina Builders & Developers, or any other developer, should apply the same questions. Compare the same details across advertisements, the brochure, and the agreement; any difference needs a written explanation.
Unrealistic Possession Timelines
Very short completion dates should prompt questions. Compare the promised date with construction progress on site and the developer’s record on earlier projects. The agreement should state the possession date, the conditions for extension, and compensation for delay. Payments should follow completed work, not marketing deadlines.